Gangnam-gu, Seoul, boasts a high fiscal self-sufficiency rate of over 70% and is recognized as a district within Seoul for its strong policy execution and administrative efficiency.
Following the comprehensive revision of the Local Autonomy Act (2022) , expanding resident participation, enhancing administrative transparency, and advancing digital administration have emerged as key priorities. Within this framework, Gangnam-gu is building a participatory autonomous administrative system
where the local council, administrative branch, and residents collaborate to design and evaluate policies .
division | detail |
|---|---|
| Administrative goals | Establishment of a participatory autonomous administration |
| Core keywords | Participatory, transparent, and digital-based administration |
| Institutional basis | Local Autonomy Act, Information Disclosure Act, Citizen Participation Budget Ordinance, etc. |
Gangnam District Office is pursuing digital civil service innovation, expanding participatory budgeting, and enhancing the climate-responsive administrative system under the motto of "smart administration and inclusive welfare."
In October 2025, the district office released the results of a campaign pledge implementation evaluation, announcing key achievements as follows:
Promise areas | Main contents | Progress |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative innovation | Introduction of electronic documents and smart civil complaint systems | 85% |
| Welfare policy | Expanding Customized Support for Youth and Single-Person Households | 72% |
| environmental policy | Enactment of the Basic Ordinance on Climate Crisis Response | 90% |
| Resident participation | Building an online participatory budgeting platform | 95% |
Gangnam-gu's recent major administrative issues can be summarized into three:
① The need to strengthen personal information protection following the introduction of smart administration
; ② Discussion on expanding the actual reflection rate of resident participation budgeting;
and ③ Budget adjustments to create a sustainable urban environment
. In particular, the digital governance system was discussed at the September 2025 council session, focusing on the "Data-Based Administrative Ordinance."
Issue | detail | note |
|---|---|---|
| Data administration | Building a data-driven policy decision system | Smart Information Department |
| Participatory budgeting | Resident suggestion reflection rate: 26.6% → 30% target | Budget Officer |
| Environmental administration | Developing a Climate Crisis Response Plan | Urban Planning Department |
Gangnam-gu Council is composed of 25 members (15 from the People Power Party and 10 from the Democratic Party), and
at the regular session in October 2025 , it deliberated on the Basic Ordinance on Responding to the Climate Crisis and the Amendment to the Ordinance on Supporting the Activation of Local Autonomy .
item | detail |
|---|---|
| Number of members | 25 people (People Power Party 15 / Democratic Party 10) |
| Major standing committees | Administrative Finance, Welfare City, and Management Committee |
| Recent agenda | Climate ordinance, resident participation ordinance, and budget review |
| source | Gangnam District Council Official Website |
Ordinance name | Main contents | Time of resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment to the Participatory Budgeting Ordinance | Expanding Youth and Online Participation | 2025.9 |
| Basic Ordinance on Climate Crisis Response | Establishing carbon neutrality goals and implementation plans | 2025.10 |
The National Assembly monitors the executive branch's policies through administrative audits and policy inquiries, and key policy inquiries are made public in real time.
The October 2025 audit reported that "delays in processing electronic civil petitions" and "the need to improve data openness" were key issues.
division | detail |
|---|---|
| Object of gratitude | 29 departments and affiliated organizations |
| Key Points | Speed of civil complaint processing, data disclosure rate, and budget execution management |
| Improvement measures | Promoting shortened processing times and automation of work |
The National Assembly members representing Gangnam District (Gap and Eul) are continuing their legislative activities related to resident welfare and economic revitalization.
In September 2025, the "Gangnam Startup Valley Creation Special Act" and the "Youth Entrepreneurship Incubator Support Project" were submitted to the National Assembly plenary session for reporting.
region | Member's name | Main activities |
|---|---|---|
| Gangnam Gap | Rep. Yoon Chang-hyun (People Power Party) | Proposed local industry specialization bill, calls for deregulation |
| Gangnam | Rep. Jeon Hyeon-hee (Democratic Party of Korea) | Proposal for a policy to expand social services based on public data |
| joint activities | Cooperation in securing budget for the Gangnam area's metropolitan transportation network | Announced in October 2025 |
Both Gangnam District Office and the council disclose budget execution, audit results, and ordinance status through the Information Disclosure Portal
. The "public data openness rate" stands at 79%
, higher than the Seoul city average (72%), maintaining a high ranking in administrative reliability and transparency.
item | Operational details | note |
|---|---|---|
| Information Disclosure System | Parallel pre-announcement + billing disclosure | Regular report |
| Public items | Budget, ordinance, business performance, and audit results | Renewed twice a year |
| Openness rate | 79% (Seoul average 72%) | As of Q3 2025 |
By 2025, Gangnam-gu will operate a "Smart Administrative Information System" and a "Data Lab," and
have piloted AI-based civil complaint analysis and policy recommendation functions.
Furthermore, a project to establish an "AI Administrative Secretary Service" (tentative name) in collaboration with the Seoul Metropolitan Government is underway.
item | detail |
|---|---|
| System name | Gangnam Data Lab |
| function | Integrated analysis of civil complaints, environment, welfare, and safety data |
| Linkage | Seoul City AI Administrative Secretary Project |
| Expected effect | Evidence-based policy decisions and administrative efficiency |
As of the second half of 2025, 420 participatory budgeting project proposals had been submitted , of which 112 had been implemented.
Additionally, programs are being implemented to expand participation among diverse groups, including youth, seniors, and foreigners.
item | detail |
|---|---|
| Participatory budget size | About 4 billion won |
| Reflection rate | 26.6% |
| Youth Participation Program | Gangnam Future Generation Forum, Policy Tonton Camp |
| Foreign participation | Pilot Operation of the Global Community Budget Debate |
All 22 neighborhoods in Gangnam-gu have established resident self-government associations, and
Yeoksam 1-dong and Gaepo 4-dong were selected as 'Seoul-style resident self-government best practices.'
item | detail |
|---|---|
| Establishment of a resident autonomy association | Full operation of 22 dong |
| Representative case | Introduction of a village camp-style decision-making system in Yeoksam 1-dong |
| network | Village community, youth policy, senior communication meeting, etc. |
division | Key points |
|---|---|
| Administrative direction | Citizen participation, transparent administration, and digital innovation |
| Group leader policy | Smart Civil Complaints, Welfare Expansion, Climate Response |
| legislative activities | Enactment and revision of ordinances, budget monitoring, and public inquiries |
| cooperative system | Cooperation between the three axes of the legislature, the executive branch, and the National Assembly |
| local autonomy | Participatory budgeting, resident self-government associations, and community revitalization |
AI-based administrative and legislative data analysis is expected to become a key driver of future local government innovation.
By linking with Seoul City's "AI Administrative Support System," Gangnam-gu can take the lead in legislative analysis, civil complaint prediction, and resident participation data visualization .
Analysis items | effect |
|---|---|
| ΔAdministrative efficiency (%) | +18.2 (Reduced work time through AI automatic analysis) |
| ΔParticipation rate (%) | +12.5 (increased reflection of data-based resident suggestions) |
| ΔReliability (index) | +0.21 (improved administrative transparency) |
| Δ Policy accuracy (%) | +9.3 (AI prediction policy establishment accuracy) |









